My Poetry Manifesto: Keep Reading, Keep Writing, Keep Revising

“Rather, I think one should write, as nearly as possible, as if he were the first person

on earth and was humbly and sincerely putting on paper that which he saw and

experienced and loved and lost; what his passing thoughts were and his sorrows and

desires.”

-Neal Cassady in a letter to Jack Kerouac

Years ago, when I first attended college and started to study writing poetry, a friend said, “What God left out, man cannot fill!” I believe he meant that writers are born to write and anyone can take classes on how to write, but only if it is in one’s nature will that individual be successful. Now to be successful, a poet must invest their self into the art and this involves ego, drive and dedication. Talent alone does not guarantee success. A poet must believe in oneself but be open minded to criticism and at the same time be true to the voice within. And by doing so one must be willing to work hard at honing craft to make work into art. This investment also involves reading, writing and revising for as long as one chooses to be a poet.

I appreciate many types poetry and we are now deep into the information age, constantly bombarded by fast paced instant images, driven by media where the written word has been cast aside for scene and sound. While poetry does have an oral tradition, audiences are more prone to expect fast-paced quick-rhyme verse acted out in a performance that may sound great but put on paper it does not reads as well. I prefer poetry that translates and provides the same impact written as well as spoken.

No true poet can achieve critical acclaim for their work without knowing how other poets from the past honed their craft. The use of mode, form, style and language from other times and cultures are essential to help create new poetry. Every major poet has looked back to see what others have done before them. Poetry, like all art forms, relies heavily on tradition, but poetry, like all other art, is not static; it changes and evolves.

The roots of my poetry go back to Walt Whitman, who answered Ralph Waldo Emerson’s call for an American poet of the people; to become a national icon who will be like the poets of ages long ago and point out man’s spiritual and physical connection to nature. The strength of poetry lies in its use of language, the common or colloquial tongue, the ability to release inner realities, and to inspire an audience or reader. The style and form of the poem do not matter if the content and message are clear. Walt Whitman’s poetry can be seen as a break from the Standard English “tradition.” Whitman did this to emphasize America as new country with new and independent ideas. His use of long lines and free verse had been used in ancient Anglo-Saxon poetry and Hebraic biblical writings, reflecting some roots to the past.

I listen to and read these poets, the ghosts who have come before me; those who never refused to face the struggle which I believe is needed to keep working on art. I have read many poets and been inspired by their works: William Carlos Williams for his experimentation with minimalism and image, Allen Ginsberg, Jack Kerouac, Lawrence Ferlinghetti and many of the other Beat Generation poets for their counterculture influence. I’ve read Charles Olson for his Projective Verse, T.S Eliot, Ranier Maria Rilke, Federico García Lorca and many more for their views on poetry itself. I may not always agree with them, often finding their opinions outdated, but I sit down and open myself to the words of poets past and discover they too always took risks, and the creation of art comes with a little death.

“The artist, and particularly the poet, is always an anarchist in the best sense of the

word. He must heed only the call that arises within him from three strong voices: the

voice of death, with all its foreboding, the voice of love and the voice of art.”

— Federico Garcia Lorca

Different writers, artists and poets will call the creative process different names. Some have called it tapping into one’s imagination, other refer to it as the subconscious and dream state. Rainer Maria Rilke believed true poetry rises from conflict between the conscious and the unconscious or what he called “the hidden insanity.” And still others reach into the darkness of their being or, as Lorca called it, Duende.

But, what is Duende? There is no true English translation for Duende. Someone might tell you the Spanish word translates literally to “master of the house” and that someone might also tell you it has something to do with the emotional spirit of art itself. But experience is the only way to truly understand what Duende is. One cannot understand light without experiencing darkness or find one’s humanity without seeing one’s own animalistic nature and one’s place in the natural world. So maybe, Duende is akin to the Higgs-boson “God particle of creation,” the life force from the primordial ooze that exists in the physical and metaphysical realm of quantum mechanics, Schrodinger’s cat that is both dead and alive at the same time. Duende is theoretical, but a truth that is as elusive as finding absolute proof of its existence, because it appears to be a necessity to answer the question of how to create true art. There is beauty in darkness. I believe Federico Garcia Lorca would agree.

Lorca agreeing.

Whenever I set out on the task to write a poem, I sometimes find myself embarking on a journey of exploration. There might be a destination I am trying to reach, be it with the subject matter or the form I wish to use to present my work. I sometimes write prose without structure to get my ideas down and then go back later to try to put them into poetry form. At other times I free write using words that I have collected from crossword puzzles, newspapers and magazines that I have stored and try to form phrases that I weave into sentence, images and poems. Frequently while writing, I smash words together to create strange and disparate images in my poetry. I believe in writing what comes to mind without constraint from anything except the depth of imagination.

However, while in the process I tend to meander and change direction and word choice. Sounds may force me to rethink form as well as the flow of words and thought may lead me to an epiphany and cause a reversal of direction, creating a new objective. Someone once said that the poem that one writes has always existed, and it is up to the poet to bring it into the physical world. Once I have a poem or the beginnings of one, I put it down for a day or two and then come back and work on it some more. There are times when I surprise myself and complete a poem in one sitting but still return to it and revise as needed.

It’s also been said that true artists and poets slit their wrists to paint and write with their own blood. Writers and artists always take risks like an acrobat walking on a wire high above or a biker riding a motorcycle at break neck speeds inches above the pavement. Both are open to nature and the elements, defying gravity with a question of balance between life and death, taking that risk to accomplish a self fulfillment of their own needs. As a poet, I must look into myself. I seek answers and go out to ponder this riddle, sitting by an ornamental cement pond. I look past the ripples in the reflecting pool.  Her image replaces mine.  The face of a chiseled goddess, framed with fiery red hair, curls like a coital knot of snakes. Her dark eyes burn with desire. I am seduced.  But her ruby lips part, revealing a gap between her yellowed buck teeth, a darkness, a blackness, an abyss. Reality and aesthetics appeared only to be a consensus of similar perceptions. I found Medusa suffers from an overbite.

All poets edit their work. Walt Whitman constantly revised and added to Leaves of Grass right up to his death. Allen Ginsberg proclaimed he used the “unedited first draft” but students of his have told me he meant the tenet, foundation, and thrust of the poem while tinkering and tweaking were needed from time to time. When revising, scrupulous examination of one’s poem must be used whether it be checking the correct use of comma, or a line break. I recite my poem out loud and listen to the rhythm and sound of words to establish a flow. I am always looking to improve my poetry to produce the best poems I can, so revising and editing my work is something I happily accept as I strive to remain a poet. As the poet Donald Hall stated, “If I don’t see for other people, then my revising is all in vain.”

My final advice to anyone choosing to claim the title of poet is just what I said at the beginning of this essay: keep reading, keep writing, keep revising be open minded to all things including criticism but always be true to the voice inside you...

My Reason

I write for those who go outside the box

and climb over the fence defying the signs,

Danger Keep Out, No Trespassing.

They are the ones who dance along the

precipice, doing pirouettes on the edge

of the abyss between the real and the ideal.

And as others have tried to bridge that

chasm with a structure made of old worm

holed planks, myth and magic tied with twine,

a string of lies, producing only an unfinished

catwalk that juts out like a diving board.

I write for those who will not take that leap

of faith, but use mortar, stone, and steel

in the here and now to span that gulf.

I write for those who live outside the lines

drawn by society, the biker, the hipster

and the burn out, those who don’t want

to live the life of the nine to five crowd,

wear stuffed shirts, a suit and tie, and be

a contestant in the rat race, running through

the maze looking for a slice of the American

Dream, that pie in the sky, that piece of cheese,

to be number one, the big cheese, a king,

an emperor, because they see the emperor

has no clothes and the cheese is Swiss

and full of holes. They see the Polly-O

String is dangling. I write for them.

I write for the musician, the artist, and the poet,

those who don’t want to go with the flow

of music. They seem to be tuned out or out

of tune but they follow a different beat.

They twist and shout, but they don’t dance

when others call the tune, or agree with

the choreography, it’s all hokey-pokey;

a big hustle to join the line and do the glide.

Call them wallflowers, I write for them.

I write for the outlaw, the outcast and the

outlandish. But they are not out of touch.

They are what they are and I am what I am.

I am a poet. I am on the outside looking in.

I write for myself.

Peter V. Dugan


Peter V. Dugan

(Nassau County Poet Laureate 2017-2019 and 2026 Walt Whitman Birthplace Poet of the Year) was born and raised on Long Island. He is a graduate of Chaminade High School, Mineola 1976, Farmingdale State College, Melville, NY Degree: Associate of Arts and Sciences 1995, and The New School for Social Research, NY, NY. Degree: Bachelor of Arts.

He has published five collections of poetry and over the years, his poetry has been published in numerous anthologies and magazines both on-line and in print. Most notably of these are Grub Street Literary & Arts Magazine, Soul Fountain, Reckless Writing: The Modernization of Poetry by Emerging Writers of the 21st Century, 2012 and 2013 and Five 2 One Literary Magazine. His latest book is The Prowess of Immodest Emptiness New and Selected Poems published by Chatter House Press Sept. 2016. Online his work has appeared in Drunk Monkeys, @ Contemporary American Voices, Think Long Island First, The Long Island Quarterly, Aberration Labyrinth, Occupy Poetry and Verse Wrights.

He co-edited and formatted the Writing Outside the Lines poetry anthology, Wyld Syde Press 2012 and co-edited LI Sounds 2015 poetry anthology, Wyld Syde Press. In 2014, he was awarded the LI Bards Poet Mentor Award by the Bards Initiative and in 2016 two of his poems were nominated for the Pushcart Poetry Prize. Peter Dugan also hosts a reading series at the Oceanside Library on Long Island, co-founded Beats by the Beach, and is a member of the Long Island Performance Poet Association while attending many poetry events in the Long Island and Metropolitanm area.


G&E In Motion does not necessarily agree with the opinions of our guest bloggers. That would be boring and counterproductive. We have simply found the author’s thoughts to be interesting, intelligent, unique, insightful, and/or important. We may not agree on the words but we surely agree on their right to express them and proudly present this platform as a means to do so.

Dance, Dance, Dance

Well, that’s what I’ve been lucky enough to be doing for the last 54 years of my life! And I’m still dancing at 71.5 years young!

It all started in 1972 when I was working my way through college. I was teaching karate at a local dojo and waitressing in Little Italy. All of a sudden there was a buzz about this new dance called The Hustle. It actually originated in the South Bronx around 1970 but worked its way into the Manhattan discos. I had no idea what it was all about, but I was intrigued to find out.

At the time, my girlfriend told me that a studio on Long Island called Dance Charisma was looking for teachers. It was near my home, but I told her I didn’t know how to dance. Even though I had the typical ballet toe, tap, and jazz lessons as a child, I wasn’t confident at all to go on this interview, but she pushed me. I went and was immediately hired. I was on the dance floor teaching beginner students within a week. My experience breaking down physical movements in the martial arts, made the transition to dance instructor quite smooth and the rest just fell into step.

I continued teaching at Dance Charisma but was eventually picked up by Fred Astaire Dance Studios. There, I received proper training in all the ballroom dances. There are 10 steps in 10 dances plus the approved variations and that’s just in the bronze syllabus. Then you have silver level, gold level, supreme gold, and theater arts. They were very strict with our training. We had to know how to do each step, both the male and female patterns, and we would get tested weekly by many professional coaches. But the one who made our blood run cold was Mrs. Parker. We were afraid of her, but that fear made us learn the syllabus inside out. Mrs. Parker helped create a great group of dancers and instructors. I’ll always be grateful to her.

Teaching wasn’t the only part of the dance business. We had weekly Friday night practice parties that were a lot of fun; two or three studios would get together and have dance mixers, some student spotlights, and usually a professional spotlight to top off the evening. There were also dance competitions that we would enter our students in. It would take many lessons to prepare for these comps. The more students who competed, and the more dances they competed in, made it very lucrative for the teachers.

I’ve also done regional camps, which were in the New York/New Jersey area, and the national comps at the Fountain Blue Hotel in Miami. It was so exciting to have my students participate. They took home trophies and memories of accomplishment that would last them a lifetime. They also got to see me perform in the professional evening shows. I was always asked to do some of my theater arts routines. Those are the dances with lifts dips and drops, and being petite and athletic, my partners loved throwing me up in the air, flipping me over their shoulders and catching me in a fish lift before returning me to the ground.

I was very lucky and really only got injured once. I was doing a drag, split across the floor, and managed to pick up a very large splinter in my very upper thigh during a rehearsal for that evening’s professional show. We went to the hospital, but they couldn’t find anything. I performed that night as planned. The splinter did come out about a month later while I was showering. A nice three-quarter inch piece of the floor. I knew something was in my thigh.

Looking back, I was so very lucky to have these experiences. I have listened and danced to the most beautiful waltzes, powerful tangos, and sensual rhumbas all through my life. I have also seen how dancing changed the lives of students, from being shy and withdrawn to confident and social. Many students met their spouses at dance events! I love choreographing the first dance for the wedding couple and even the whole wedding party routines.

Dancing is an incredible sport and yes, it is a sport. And yes, dancers are athletes. I only realize that at 57 years old when I started doing triathlons and my body was conditioned enough to learn how to swim, bike, and run. I attribute that to dancing and my 15 years in martial arts. 

At any dinner, wedding, or anywhere music is played, dancers have the most fun. We eat and drink and then dance it off! We are the envy of all who just sit and watch. When I used to dance with my husband and do a tango, people would come up to us complementing our dance. What they didn’t know was that when I would dance with my husband, nothing else existed. I was lost in the wonderful connection that music and dance allow you to feel. 

So, I have been so blessed being able to share my passion for this sport and will continue to teach and encourage all future dancers.


Pamela Joya Arcuri

is a multi-award-winning performer and dancer who has been acting since 1970 in theatre and film. She has been an active SAG member for 49 years. Her career has taken her into other areas of activity and entertainment as well. Ballroom dancing has been a lifelong passion, and she has been professionally teaching and performing it for over 50 years. Pam also holds two black belts in Shotokan and American style Karate. She’s a Triathlete swimmer and cyclist. She has choreographed many dance and Karate routines for music videos and indie features. Pam was a featured performer and choreographer in community theatre for over 20 years.


G&E In Motion does not necessarily agree with the opinions of our guest bloggers. That would be boring and counterproductive. We have simply found the author’s thoughts to be interesting, intelligent, unique, insightful, and/or important. We may not agree on the words but we surely agree on their right to express them and proudly present this platform as a means to do so.

Tips on Writing in Long Form

A family friend asked me one day if I loved writing like I love breathing. It’s when I answered, “Yes” that I realized that I want to do this for as long as I am able. I think she asked me that question around the time that I was publishing my second novel, Eeala And The Water Dragons. I’m not sure. Somewhere between my second and third published book. That question lingered on my mind for many years now because whenever the process gets tough, I refer back to that moment and my answer.

Fast forward to the present where I’m currently in the process of finishing my sixth novel; I feel reflecting on the process of writing is beneficial to the reader (you) and to myself. So, I’ll start.

“In the beginning, there was light.”

This biblical quote exemplifies that there first needs to be a spark to get anything done. In other words, before you get to the page, you have to work on the idea.

What are you trying to convey to your audience? Who is your audience? What is the purpose of writing in the first place? Your purpose. Finding the purpose might mean creating an outline or writing a note about where you want the story to go or what you want the story to look like. I like to find the ending of the story while still creating the beginning.

As writers, you’re painting pictures with words. First, you need to see it before the audience even knows it exists. That requires many notes and possibly an outline of the story in its entirety. It will help if it’s organized because then you can play with characters and piece together plot twists.

But we’ll get to that.

The second move you should make after having the notes and the outline is simple: write. You feel ready. But you have to “put pen to paper.” Just write and see where it takes you. It may suck. You may hate it in the beginning BUT keep going. It may take you places you never thought you would go in the story. The more time and effort you spend building your plots and characters, the more it will grab the reader. You’re putting in the effort!

You may get tired. You may need to take a day off from it or a week. Maybe a month. Keep building the juices up in your head. Let it be your focus and you will come up with more details and feel the need to get back to it.

Now you might be close or closing in on the end. You put in the work. The effort can be seen now and you’re almost ready to share it with the world.

Read it. Share it with a friend and see what they think. Share it with an editor. Engage in your community (local or digital) to see if you can find people to work with you on your projects. It will help. “No man is an island.” Side note: I wrote that quote in one of my books, but you’ll have to buy it to know which one.

I’m working on two series. The first one is titled The Exhale Chronicles. The second is titled Tales of the Aceustik Sea. So far, I’m almost three quarters done with a four-part series (Exhale) and one third into the other. How I balance maintaining each story and keeping it relevant to the plan is to reflect and go back to notes when I feel like I lost the direction of the story. Give yourself grace when you’re stuck on a plot point. I have found it will come to you if you focus.

I switch off from series to series so I write one of Exhale and then one of the other (Tales…) but you should find your writing style and pace by doing the work: writing. Your own process will come to you. I’ll leave you with that.


Q. Imagine

is a multi-disciplinary writer, with titles such as author, a screenwriter, playwright, poet and book reviewer of The Scene (thescene.life). Some recent publications include, Worlds Of Possibility, Nebulous Magazine, Bards Annual, Alien Buddha Press, Quill & Crow and Suffolk County Poetry Review. Her book, Eeala And The Water Dragons was nominated for the 2021 Reader’s Choice Awards. Besides writing, she is an avid lover of music, spending time outdoors and watching movies. She has been writing poetry since she learned how to write. Her work can be found on Medium, Instagram and Amazon under her pen name, @qimagine.


G&E In Motion does not necessarily agree with the opinions of our guest bloggers. That would be boring and counterproductive. We have simply found the author’s thoughts to be interesting, intelligent, unique, insightful, and/or important. We may not agree on the words but we surely agree on their right to express them and proudly present this platform as a means to do so.

A Timeless Tool for Actors that’s Quietly Failing Them PostPandemic

Headshots. We all know them (well—those of us who were living that prepandemic audition life). But in the postpandemic ecosystem, I’m seeing headshots either used incorrectly or treated like a side dish—while selftapes and reels have become the main course.

So, what’s a “proper” headshot? I’ll get there (promise). But first—context matters. I’m a multi-hyphenate creative with decades of professional performing experience: a BFA in Musical Theatre, a member of Actors’ Equity Association, and an Associate Member of the Stage Directors and Choreographers Society. After 15+ years onstage, I pivoted into visual arts—building a Brooklyn studio that supports artists through headshot and editorial photography (and yes, I’m a Professional Photographers of America member). In parallel, I’ve developed an indie driven award-winning cinematography career across narrative shorts, feature length docs, branded content, and festival recognized projects—some streaming via global distributors like HBO Max and Netflix. And because I’m apparently incapable of choosing one lane, I still hop back into theatre to collaborate and direct when the timing, project, and $ (unfortunately) make sense.

When I started shooting headshots, my goal was to fuse the parts of this industry I loved most: performance psychology, visual storytelling, and practical career strategy. I learned early (the hard way, like most entrepreneurs do) that usable marketing and clear positioning aren’t “extra”—they’re infrastructure. So yes, I bring a cinematic sensibility into the studio: intentional lighting, clean framing, and an aesthetic that feels like it belongs in the same universe as the work you want to book. But aesthetics are just the packaging. The real question is: is the image doing its job?

That job starts with the basics—does it look like you, on a normal day, without visual noise stealing focus from your eyes? Absolutely. But the higher-order function of a headshot is messaging. For me, the winning triad is: Confident, Grounded, and Engaging. Those aren’t just nice adjectives—they’re positioning signals.

Each “look” (the combo of wardrobe, environment, and lighting) should be engineered for a specific casting lane. One look might whisper HBO thriller; another might practically wink at a Netflix comedy. A headshot is the tool that works when you’re not in the room—it creates the micro-engagement that suggests, “I have a point of view,” or “I’m mid-thought,” which is exactly the kind of subtle, cerebral connection that helps decision makers imagine you inside the rehearsal process. And when there are five finalists sitting on a table and the team can only pick one? That subconscious nudge is very real, and the headshot is working for you when you are not even in the room!

These practices are standard among serious NYC headshot photographers. Where things get messy is how the pandemic—and the shift away from in-person auditions—recalibrated priorities. Here are three core dynamics I keep seeing:

  • 1) Lack of in-person auditions + the selftape takeover: This created a weird cross-pollination of issues. Actors weren’t around each other enough to clock whether their shots were dated (or drifting off-trend), and they weren’t walking into rooms where someone behind the table might gently (or not-so-gently) ask, “Wait… when did you take this?” Meanwhile, self tapes became the first impression—often instead of the headshot—which pushed performers to invest in a whole at home capture workflow: lights, backdrops, mics, tripods, and more. Add the extra cost dancers face when renting studio space to tape musical theatre dance calls, and the price of “just auditioning” climbs fast. The tough part is that many self tapes likely aren’t viewed in full, so the ROI can feel brutal. And because the industry knows the burden is real, I’ve watched standards around headshots quietly soften into a “do what you can” mindset—letting details slide that would never have flown 10–15 years ago. And that fails them.

  • 2) Lack of education (aka: the headshot knowledge gap): I’ve witnessed a genuinely alarming drop in how training programs teach the function of a headshot. Over my shooting career I’ve visited 30+ colleges, universities, and conservatory programs to photograph students. Pre-pandemic, many came in with a plan: goals, strategies, and an understanding that a targeted headshot is a positioning tool—not just a nice picture. Post-pandemic, I’ve had students who didn’t know you put your name on a headshot… or that it gets printed… or why borders, orientation (vertical vs. horizontal), and crop discipline matter. When submissions live inside platforms like Actors Access, it’s easy for the headshot to devolve into “upload something and call it a day.”

    On top of that, fewer programs (often due to budget constraints) are bringing in vetted, working headshot photographers—or even providing students with a shortlist of reputable options to research. I once had a department head at a prominent NYC training program tell me I needed to drop my rates dramatically because “these kids nowadays will just go to the friend with a camera.” Sure, I know that’s happening (we’ll get there), but why isn’t the institution pushing back and teaching the value proposition? The industry seems to lean satisfied and avoid conflict as long as the box is checked. “You have a headshot.” But a box-checked headshot is not the same as a marketable one. And that fails them.

  • 3) Inexperienced photographers + trend-chasing aesthetics + social media gravity: During the pandemic, we saw a totally predictable influx of “kids with a camera”—artists who lost theatre/film work and needed revenue, fast. The setup is accessible now: an entry level mirrorless body, a couple of colored backdrops, and a soft box kit from Amazon—and suddenly you’ve got a living-room studio (sometimes technically outside what NYC zoning allows for commercial activity). Many of these folks priced aggressively, undercutting established rates, and a single overall “look” spread quickly because it was easy to replicate. And to be clear: I’m not mad at it. That’s how a lot of us started (me included—shoutout to my old DSLR era). The industry needs emerging photographers.

  • The issue is the downstream effect: a narrow set of angles/lighting/framing choices became dominant, which can flatten individuality and reduce headshots to a monotonous template. More importantly, many newer shooters (and sometimes clients) prioritize “beautification” over communication—the kind of engaged eye-line and intentional body language that actually evokes something for you. Add social media into the mix and you get a drift toward wider, more editorial portraits—hands, furniture, dramatic negative space—great for websites and feeds, but not always optimal for submission thumbnails, print, or famed Playbills once the image is cropped to the face. If the session investment is real (and it is), the ROI should be engineered around the actor’s message—not the elements creating “the shot.” And that fails them.

To wrap this up: I root hard for every one of my clients, and I genuinely root for my fellow headshot photographers and educators too. But if we want actors to thrive, we have to stop treating the headshot like a “good enough” or “cool photo” accessory. Background, wardrobe, and lighting style are important—but they’re secondary. The primary deliverable is a strategically positioned image that’s distraction free, casting legible, and unmistakably engaging—confident, grounded, cinematic, and like you’ve got something to say. Because you do.


ABOUT MATT

Like many, my love of photography began years ago as a creative outlet while performing. In-between shows, gigs, auditions and classes, I would experiment with different lenses, lighting and subjects. It wasn’t long before I discovered the power of a photo that truly captures people at their best while helping them in their own careers. My passion became a driving force and turned quickly into a successful business.   

As a NYC based headshot photographer, I have the great joy of getting to meet and collaborate with so many talented artists, and it’s one of my favorite aspects of my job. Coming from a professional performing background, I know how important marketing yourself wisely is, and how much of a difference it can make in your success. A good headshot not only makes you look great, but it captures who you really are and is ENGAGING! This is the moment that I strive to get out of my clients on every shoot.  My #1 goal is to discover the aspect of each person that makes Casting, Directors & Producers scream, “I want to get to know them!”

Beyond photography, I’m an award-winning Director of Photography, as well as an original co-founder of www.ontherocksfilms.com, where I currently serving as the Creative Director and resident Director of Photography.  Recently, I was honored with three Best Cinematography Awards for my work the feature length documentary, UPROOTED: The Journey of Jazz Dance (HBO Max), FREE (AMAZON PRIME) & the On The Rocks Films original short, DIVIDENDS.

I still remain active in the professional theatrical community as member of AEA and currently direct and choreograph for productions around the country. I look forward to meeting you and guiding you towards a personally unique and captivating image...while having a lot of fun in the process!


G&E In Motion does not necessarily agree with the opinions of our guest bloggers. That would be boring and counterproductive. We have simply found the author’s thoughts to be interesting, intelligent, unique, insightful, and/or important. We may not agree on the words but we surely agree on their right to express them and proudly present this platform as a means to do so.

Bruegel’s Icarus: We Really Don’t Care. Do We?

La chute d’lcare Pieter I BRUEGEL (BRUEGHEL)

Ca. 1527/30 - Bruxelles 1569

Musées royaux des Beaux-Arts de Belgique, Bruxelles / photo : J. Geleyns - Art Photography

After all these years. Finally, here I am. Face to face with you. In the flesh. You, fine example of Flemish Renaissance. You, precursor to the Baroque. You, you perplexing driver of thoughts. You’ve been an inspirational thorn in the side of many.

In the Royal Old Masters Museum in Brussels, like W. H. Auden and many others before me, I stand in front of the work, Pieter I. Bruegel’s Landscape with the Fall of Icarus, the painting I have taught throughout my career as an English professor in mythology and literature classes but have only seen in slides. I’m with my sister on vacation in Belgium. Because she has nerve damage in her feet, it’s hard for her to tour museums, so I push her through the building in a wheelchair, which ensures I have a captive audience at this moment. I set her up in front of the painting, explaining the significance of this meeting for me.

What follows is some of what I told my sister—augmented with much of what I have taught and thought for many years. You might wonder if seeing the actual painting changed my appreciation for it in any way, and I would have to say, probably not. But I don’t mean to suggest an anticlimactic experience. It was more akin to the ideal culmination of a pen pal relationship: the other of your correspondence turning out to be exactly what you imagined and hoped for. No finding out you were catfished. No crushing disappointment. No feeling of, “meh,” as so many people report with the Mona Lisa in the Louvre. Then again, I wasn’t fighting a bus-load of tourists with cameras flashing, standing 50 yards away. I was up close and personal, capitalizing on an intimate relationship that took a good portion of my life to cultivate.

I tell my sister what I’ve told my students. The best way to begin is to play treasure hunt. Where’s Icarus? The painting features a well-dressed burgher in the foreground, plowing a field in tandem with an equine, head bowed as he tills the soil. He’s the main event in the composition, enlarged and bedecked in complementing red and green to showcase his resplendent costume. In the background, a landscape of sea and sky, sun and ships opens to a wideness that dwarfs the human players. If you are persistent, though, you will find, towards the right corner off the shoreline, a pair of small kicking legs indicating an inverted figure breaking the water surface. This is the fallen Icarus—faceless, drowning—insignificant, it seems, in an event in which you imagine him center stage.

Your first reaction to your discovery might be to laugh. Expecting the tragedy we associate with Ovid’s story of the boy who flew too high and fell too far, the viewer instead is treated to the comic absurd, that is, Bruegel’s absurd, which, like Hieronymus Bosch’s, is a bit sinister. A good illustration of what I mean is found in another Bruegel painting, The Bird Trap, a delightful snow scene of skaters that includes, off to the side, the device of its title. The idyllic narrative of the everyday is disrupted by the implied impending capture: the crushing of the songbirds that have gathered to feed at the baited trap. The necessary violence that underwrites the quotidian joys of existence is unremarked, but it is there, subtly infused through every strand of the commonplace. The enabling constraint of static depiction inherent in the genres of painting allows Bruegel to achieve the effect. We are stuck in the narrative frame before the trap is sprung, thus rendering the violence implied rather than accomplished, evoking sensations in us of the uncanny rather than simple horror.

The same can be said of the Icarus painting, only in this case, my attention diverts to the action preceding the static moment of Icarus’s fall. What were the other denizens of the scene doing prior to the great failure? In Ovid’s poem from the Metamorphoses, the most widely known source for the story, he focuses on that action, describing the shock and amazement at seeing a young boy in flight. But Bruegel’s ironic referencing and warping of Ovid takes us to a darker place. His characters respond in exactly the opposite way from the poet’s. Rather than watching aghast the tragic flight unfold, Bruegel’s ploughman, shepherds, and sea-faring vessels either never even see the young boy or, having seen, turn away to carry on with their lives, uninterested, unimpressed, or seemingly unable to intervene. We cannot know which, but the differences are arguably crucial in how we view our own agentive capacities as well as our fellow humans with whom we share this earth.

In his ekphrasis “Musée des Beaux Arts” (1938), Auden presumes to answer the question for us, or we think he does. The poem’s speaker, taking in the plenitude of the museum’s collection, announces “About suffering they were never wrong,/ The Old Masters: how well they understood/ Its human position,” and then directs our attention to the specific example in “Breughel’s Icarus” that the speaker is pondering:

. . . everything turns away

Quite leisurely from the disaster; the ploughman may

Have heard the splash, the forsaken cry,

But for him it was not an important failure; the sun shone

As it had to on the white legs disappearing into the green

Water; and the expensive delicate ship that must have seen

Something amazing, a boy falling out of the sky,

Had somewhere to get to and sailed calmly on.

While Auden hedges on the ploughman, he is convinced that the sailors must have seen Icarus yet continued on their way, commerce’s exigency taking precedence over a singular human life. Given the year of publication, readers sometimes conclude that Auden is commenting on a populace’s apathy in the face of rising fascism, concerned with their own lives and not the in-progress atrocities and loss of our collective humanity. This interpretation, while plausible, is heavy-handed and moves us away from the subtle frissons of Bruegel’s narrative. To be fair, such a view of “Musée des Beaux Arts” disallows an ambiguity that Auden’s words themselves preserve. Rather than deliberately turn away, the ploughman may not have seen Icarus at all. In other words, he may have missed the entire air-borne spectacle.

Why?

The poet Michael Hamburger offers a reason in his more recent “Lines on Brueghel’s Icarus” (1984): “The ploughman,” he tells us, simply “ploughs.” The speaker describes a routine existence that does not permit viewing what in Auden’s poem is “something amazing.” Hamburger goes on to describe sailors and shepherds, even sheep, whose lives are so narrow and exclusionary as to disallow the ability to see or comprehend feats of the ancient champion defying “the ordering planet.” This, then, is less about apathy and more about stunted growth and limited possibilities. The ploughman has been so spiritually and emotionally impoverished by his chronic furrow-making that he is incapable of looking up and appreciating the wondrous—or someone engaging in the impractical, which indeed is what occurs when Icarus turns his flight into an epic achievement rather than a means of desperate escape. The ploughman’s sensibilities are literally in a rut, and his plough is for him what our phones are for us today: the device that keeps us from noticing what is happening around us.

Unlike Auden who focuses on human suffering, Hamburger is interested in portraying the heroic difference between Icarus and others. But in doing so, he also curtails the possibilities presented by Bruegel. There is more than a touch of condescension in Hamburger’s treatment of the scene’s laborers, which is arguably not part of Bruegel’s vision. Instead of a hopeless world bereft of compassion or empathy, Bruegel’s focus on the ploughman could just as easily suggest a reverence for life and survival. Was Icarus’s act of defiance heroic or merely self-indulgent, and if the latter, can we then view the ploughman as a sustainer of life whose homely work brings forth food from the earth to nourish the human race? Unlike the obtuse refuseniks in the contemporary movie Don’t Look Up, who belligerently disregard the evidence of their own senses, our ploughman and his earth-bound gaze may embody a kind of authentic persistence in a world filled with sensational distractions. After all, we might ask about the nature of Icarus’s so-called achievement; whether he is a mover of boundaries or merely a thrill- seeker. Not that the two must be mutually exclusive.

When Melania Trump visited a migrant children’s detention center in Texas wearing a jacket with the now infamous phrase “I don’t really care. Do U?”, many of us were appalled by the tone-deaf choice. It was difficult not to experience this symbolism as insensitivity to suffering children separated from their desperate parents, despite assurances from the First Lady to the contrary. But I have wondered whether, in another context and projected from a different ethos than FLOTUS inhabits, the phrase on the jacket might have hit different. Instead of callousness, the refusal to care about the judgments of others can be a productive defiance, as much as it might be a childish rationalization to evade standards of decency. On the other hand, refusing the rapture of the sensational is another kind of rebellion. The ploughman’s conformity is not mindless but good judgment, something the dare-devil Icarus failed to display. The ploughman has stuck to his task and won the day. He endures with his feet on the ground. There’s no need to buy into the dualistic conceit that lofty aspirations are any more worthwhile than what terra firma has to offer.

But Bruegel’s ploughman as a contemporary well-to-do citizen, placed anachronistically in a mythic structure, may not align with such a wholesome view. His fancy dress, distancing him from the peasantry, makes him less the salt of the earth and more a prosperous farmer taking advantage of the profits to be made from agriculture under capitalism. The economy is thriving, and so is he. In the modern world, there is no longer need or room for the ancient hero and his tales. We truly don’t care about Icarus. Icarus never had the chance to grow up, but we have. Nostalgia, who needs it?

Well, maybe poets like Hamburger. Hamburger lauds Icarus as an “angel” in contrast with the “churlish” folk who people the world, a dime a dozen. James Joyce, along with the poet Anne Sexton, saw Icarus as the artist who flies higher and sees more than the rest of us left below on the ground, purblind and numb. The romantic view, if elitist, even narcissistic, is hard to resist—unless, like Bruegel, you find a bit of pleasure in the perverse. Of course, we might see the glorification of a doomed venture as its own worthwhile perversity. So it is with Sexton’s “To a Friend Whose Work Has Come to Triumph,” a sonnet inspired by the Icarus legend (as well as Yeats’ “To a Friend Whose Work Has Come to Nothing”) but not, as far as I know, by the Bruegel work. For Sexton, failure is not an option for Icarus because there is no failure, only a steep price to be paid for the great privilege of achievement. Delightfully, Sexton takes us full circle when her poem asks of Icarus: “Who cares that he fell back to sea?” This is not the same question of care that an absorbed ploughman poses for us or a clueless First Lady.

Instead, it is a defiant declaration of “triumph.” We might imagine George Clooney’s character, Jay Kelly, someone who sacrificed personal ties for fame, taking solace in Sexton’s couplet: “See [Icarus] acclaiming the sun and come plunging down/ while his sensible daddy goes straight into town.”

Sexton invites us into full-on tragic mode, complete with fall, the pleasure of which Bruegel potentially seeks to rob from us. Milan Kundera says that tragedy saves us because it provides us with the illusion that we matter; we are important enough for our failures to count. From The Art of the Novel (1986): “By providing us with the lovely illusion of human greatness, the tragic brings us consolation. The comic is crueler: it brutally reveals the meaninglessness of everything.” As a Czech writer who lived in exile during the Cold War, Kundera was preoccupied with the hair’s breadth that often separates tragedy and the comic absurd and how one easily transforms into the other. In the second quarter of the 21 st century, we know about this all too well; we hover in the nowhere of disbelief, between laughter and tears. We watch comedians mine the unrelenting news cycle by parodying events that are already parodies of themselves. We witness those who dictate our destinies, wearing large hats and clown suits while they crash the clown car which, it turns out, contains our lives.

Bruegel also knew this territory of bitter irony that, if we were inclined to bottom-line it, might be summed up in the expression, “funny/not funny.” After we laugh at those silly flailing legs of our fallen Icarus, we realize the joke is on us. We are left with the messy work of sorting out what is lost and what remains and what, after all, we are to do about it.


Wendy Ryden

is a retired Professor of English, Long Island University, Post campus.


G&E In Motion does not necessarily agree with the opinions of our guest bloggers. That would be boring and counterproductive. We have simply found the author’s thoughts to be interesting, intelligent, unique, insightful, and/or important. We may not agree on the words but we surely agree on their right to express them and proudly present this platform as a means to do so.